For supporters of the ruling NDC party, these spokesmen and women of these groups are merely appendages of the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP) Ghana’s biggest opposition political party and they are convinced to believe so. Many of these persons have equally held themselves in the not too distant past as die-in-the-wool supporters of the NPP (so they say) and have associated themselves privately and publicly with the party at different levels and thus are merely doing the bidding of the biggest opposition party whose purpose is to run down the ruling government and replace them in government when successful at the polls. It is an opinion that has been pushed and defended on several occasion by assigns and sympathizers of the ruling National Democratic Congress party.
Conversely, followers of these groups and think tanks posit the argument that even if they are perceived as members of the opposition or assigns of same, they are indeed Ghanaians who pay taxes (an assertion that is verifiable) and have every right to speak out on any matter they think does not work in their interest (or in the interest of Ghanaians) and so supporters of the ruling NDC let alone state officials have no businesses opposing their views but are to swallow their criticisms hook, line and sinker.
No matter where one belonged in this raging war of words between the parties, the rules of engagement under the tenets of multi-party democracy and the guarantee of freedoms saves all parties involved to freely express their view3s, agreements, disagreements within the confines of the 1992 Constitution and to the third eye watching from a distance, they will not hesitate to drag whoever is regarded to have overridden his or her powers or rights within the polity to the appropriate state institutions in order to protect those how have nothing to do with whoever becomes President in Ghana once they are free to go about their daily activities without and fear of restriction, the real neutrals.
I have heard the President of IMANi, Mr. Franklin Cudjoe referred at least twice, to state officials who challenged him to his relentless citations of the President, the government functionaries and appointees and “incompetent” as a bunch of “idiots”. In fact, this refrain of refereeing to the President of Ghana and members of government as “incompetent” is not limited to the IMANi Boss alone but same tag line used constantly by many persons in opposition parties including some who are even yet to be employed in their first jobs.
Etymologically, an idiot in Athenian Democracy was someone who was characterised by self-centeredness and concerned almost exclusively with private-as opposed to public-affairs. Idiocy was the natural state of ignorance into which all persons were born and its opposite, citizenship, was effected through formalized education. Thus in Athenian Democracy, we are all born idiots until we are educated to become citizens. This is the political scientist’s interpretation of a born idiot.
The Minister of Agriculture launched some counter attacks on some members of Occupy Ghana, including respected Lawyer Ace Kojo Anan Ankomah, who recently photoshoped some pictures and posted them on social media under the user name of Deputy Minister of Information, Felix Kwakye Ofosu in the attempt to mock the Minister and call his government deceptive, dishonest and a lying group of persons who Ghanaians should never trust. That act attracted equal counter response from assigns of the ruling government and that post was shamefully pulled down and apology rendered to the public.
Political analysts and watchers of the ongoing banter between these pseudo-opposition groups who are holding themselves as “neutral” middle class citizens have encouraged parties involved to gleefully own up to their ideologies and who they support within the political space rather than acting up hypocritically only to be biased in their renditions and undertakings in cahoots with the opposition forces interested in bringing down the Mahama administration. It is rather interesting that these persons easily get offended when they are tagged as doing the bidding of opposition forces when indeed that is exactly what the case is. They are quick to cite the moribund Committee of Joint Action (CJA), whose leading members are today Ministers of State and Deputies as another hypocritical group who have refused to criticize the NDC government with the same verve they did to the NPP a few years ago while the latter was in power. The CJA members have claimed that they had always stated that their call was to get the NPP out of power and they had succeeded in doing that thus their current state of comatose.
Mr. Franklin Cudjoe of IMANi and his colleagues in the various groups are up in arms against Hon. Fiifi Kwetey (MP Ketu South) and Dr. Edward Omane Boamah, Minister of Communications for digging up his education history and alleging that Franklin had failed severally in his attempt at a course in Economics at the Secondary School level. Franklin counters that though he had not been successful at some attempts he finally made it through to pursue higher education at some levels which again is verifiable.
I am not sure this whole criticisms and counter criticisms should degenerate this low but it is rather curious that Mr. Franklin Cudjoe had been a chief proponent of the “Incompetent Government” mantra when he himself has a history of attempting one project at least 3 times before being successful. It is not bad to try over and over again when one is not successful at one bid and in fact, many people have gone through that experience in business, relationship, marriage, education, examinations, thesis, designing, and in countless other endeavours but do we have to attack the personalities of persons either in government or in opposition simply because we disagree with them?
You do not keep referencing persons who might have been more successful than you in one field as “incompetent” and expect them not to hit back at you especially when governance involves a matrix of engagements, projects, management cycles, relationships and undertakings which some of their fiercest critics have had no prior experience in to warrant them the previous knowledge to attack the personality of the President and his Ministers.
Even in advanced countries where education, institutions, personnel, logistics and data is ever present used extensively, there are policy slips, failures and re structuring but that does not mean those at the realm of affairs are “incompetent” or they are simply “idiots”.
The cross-fire on both sides should stop and lets rather spend the time and energy on ongoing actions by government to correct the imbalances within public policy implementations, strategies, projects and their usefulness and strengthening our legal frame works, institutions and state organisations tasked with securing what is in the public interest rather than exalting efforts from just one side to bring down the other.